## Daily Digest - February 22, 2026

### 🤖 iOS AI Development

**AI Agents Comparison from iOS Developer Perspective**
A comprehensive benchmark of 7 AI coding agents for iOS development tested on a real login bug. The author tested GitHub Copilot, Xcode Coding Assistant, Cursor, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Code, and Codex. Results: Cursor was fastest (5/5 speed) with perfect accuracy, Claude Code was the best default choice for Apple developers, and GitHub Copilot underperformed with significant regressions. The study found that the model used matters less than the tool's implementation.
[Read more →](https://brightinventions.pl/blog/ai-agents-comparison-from-ios-dev-perspective/)

**AI Tools in iOS Development: Copilot vs Cursor vs Claude**
A practical breakdown of which AI tools to use for different iOS development tasks. Cursor excels at debugging complex issues, Claude handles refactoring and broader context, Copilot shines with inline completions, and Xcode's AI integration works best for SwiftUI snippets. The article notes that while AI agents now handle scaffolding SwiftUI views, generating snapshot tests, and drafting API documentation, Core Data modeling remains human territory.
[Read more →](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/naveen-reddy-guntaka_iosdevelopment-ai-swiftui-activity-7425791554197377024-Kp53)

### 🛠️ AI Coding Assistants

**Claude Code vs Cursor vs GitHub Copilot: Which AI Coding Assistant is Best in 2025?**
An extensive comparison of the three leading AI coding tools. Cursor completed a CRUD API project in 22 minutes, Claude Code took 35 minutes with zero errors on first run, and GitHub Copilot took 45 minutes with several corrections needed. The author recommends Cursor for daily coding (80% of tasks), Claude Code for complex refactoring, and Copilot for quick scripts. Each tool requires a different mindset: Copilot works like autocorrect, Cursor like pair programming, and Claude Code like managing a junior developer.
[Read more →](https://medium.com/@kantmusk/the-ai-coding-assistant-war-is-heating-up-in-2025-a344bf6a2785)

### 🧠 Latest Coding Models

**AI Model Comparison 2025: DeepSeek vs GPT-4 vs Claude vs Llama for Enterprise Use Cases**
Claude Opus 4.5 leads enterprise coding with an 80.9% SWE-bench score and 54% market share among enterprise developers. DeepSeek V3 delivers competitive performance at $1.50 per million tokens versus $15 for Claude—a 10x cost savings. The article reveals the cost crossover point for self-hosting open-source models is around 5 million tokens monthly. For high-volume tasks, DeepSeek offers 90% of Claude's capability at 10% of the cost.
[Read more →](https://www.softwareseni.com/ai-model-comparison-2025-deepseek-vs-gpt-4-vs-claude-vs-llama-for-enterprise-use-cases/)

**ChatGPT vs Claude vs Gemini: The Best AI Model for Each Use Case in 2025**
A head-to-head test of Claude 4, ChatGPT O3, and Gemini 2.5 for coding, writing, and deep research. For coding, Claude built a fully-featured Tetris game and a playable Super Mario Level 1—neither Gemini nor O3 came close. For writing, Claude best captured the author's voice. For deep research, ChatGPT hit the sweet spot. The bottom line: Claude 4 for best coding results, Gemini 2.5 for best value, and ChatGPT for personal assistance with its memory feature.
[Read more →](https://creatoreconomy.so/p/chatgpt-vs-claude-vs-gemini-the-best-ai-model-for-each-use-case-2025)

### ⚡ OpenClaw Updates

*No new OpenClaw-specific updates found in today's search. Check the project's Discord or GitHub directly for the latest features and announcements.*

### 🚀 Digital Entrepreneurship

*Limited new SaaS/indie hacking success stories found for this week. Consider checking Indie Hackers (indiehackers.com) or Hacker News Show HN for the latest founder stories and revenue milestones.*

---
*Daily Digest generated on February 22, 2026*
